The Wolfman (2010)

[boyko]

2 nova clipa

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDyG8hO3x5E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T4RHBY8NGI

[Sammy]

2 nova clipa

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDyG8hO3x5E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T4RHBY8NGI

izgleda super

[A$H]

I asked Chris to put together a post featuring the different looks of the Wolfman through the ages, and he sent me nude pictures of Emily Blunt and Geraldine Chaplin instead.

As you all know by now Benicio Del Toro’s The Wolfman arrives in theaters on February 12, 2010. It stars Emily Blunt as Gwen Conliffe and Geraldine Chaplin as Malev.

[boyko]

"A new featurette of the Wolfman in which Actor Benicio Del Toto introduces the film and his character"

http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/the-wol ... howVideo=1

[Dragonrage]

The Wolfman (2010) 3/5 - TRAILER

Nakon gotovo godinu dana odgađanja, premontiravanja i dosnimavanja, "The Wolfman" redatelja Joe Johnsona, remake istoimenog filma iz 1941., napokon je spreman za publiku. Kada neki film ima toliko problema tijekom post-produkcije i kad ga se konstantno odgađa, onda to obično ne miriše na dobro i na kraju završi katastrofom. E sad, da li je tako i u ovom slučaju? Pa…djelomično je. Doduše, ne bih išao u krajnost i rekao da je novi Wolfman katastrofa, ali isto tako niti ne oduševljava.
Naime, glavni problem filma je to što je jednostavno predugačak, definitivno prespor, predvidljiv te se vukodlak prerano otkriva. Nikako ga ne bih mogao okarakterizirati kao napet ili atmosferičan, scary film, unatoč tome što ima i akcije, i nasilja, i misterije. Vjerojatno je zato film i bio nekoliko puta na montažnom stolu. Moja pretpostavka je da su autori montažom htjeli popraviti ritam filma, učiniti ga uzbudljivijim, ali ne mogu reći da im je to baš pošlo za rukom. Pa iako to možda i nije bitno, te definitivno nije nikakav relevantni pokazatelj ičega, moram reći da sam tijekom filma nekoliko puta zijevao, što mu baš i ne ide u prilog.
No, ima film i svojih dobrih strana. To je prije svega vizualni aspekt filma. Ali da će film vizualno izgledati izvrsno se već moglo zaključiti i iz silnih slika, postera i trailera. Fotografija je izvrsna, baš kao i kostimi, scenografija, te naravno maska. Rick Baker je ovdje uistinu napravio maestrala posao, te još jednom dokazao zašto on spada u crème de la crème zanata. S te vizualne strane film bi se mogao usporediti sa naslovima kao što su primjerice najnoviji "Sherlock Holmes", Burtonov "Sweeney Todd" ili pak Sommersov "Van Helsing" - dakle prevladava viktorijanski gothic stil.
Upravo zahvaljujući tom vizualnom aspektu, film uvelike djeluje onako starinski, sličan originalu. A isto tako, u isto vrijeme djeluje i moderno, i to prije svega zahvaljujući silnom nasilju koje se može vidjeti u gotovo svakom modernom hororu, a koje je i ovdje prisutno. S toga ljubitelji gorea ne bi trebali ostati razočarani pošto otkinutih udova, iščupanih ruku, nogu, glava, rasipanih crijeva, čupanja jetre i svega ostaloga ima i više nego dovoljno.
Pa iako je gotovo nemoguće fulati sa ekipom kao što su Benicio del Toro, Anthony Hopkins i Hugo Weaving, ne može se reći da su oni ovdje ostvarili vrhunske izvedbe za pamćenje. Ali nisu ni katastrofalno loše, onako, solidno i površno, bez neke dublje karakterizacije. Što se radnje tiče, film uvelike prati radnju originala. Iako naravno, odstupanja ima, posebice u završnici koja je po meni bila highlight filma i u mom slučaju malo diže finalnu ocjenu, iako sam takav rasplet i očekivao. Također, kao što je bilo i za očekivati, kraj nam naravno ostavlja mogućnosti za nastavak, ali nekako sumnjam da će do njega ikada doći. Iako, nikad se ne zna.

Sve u svemu, ako se mene pita, film je nekakav prosjek. Da se pogledat, ali kak se ono kaže, nit miriše, nit smrdi.

[Boby]

Dobar osvrt
Iako film nisam još pogledal s obzirom na dosadašnje recenzije nekak mi se čini da će ovaj remake zavšiti kao i preradbe Drakule (1992) i Frankensteina (1994); dakle, dobra glumačaka ekipa s mlakim ostvarenjima, vizualnost na visokom nivou i izgubljenost u scenariju s profulanim karakterizacijama likova.

[Asfodel]

Ja nisam očekivala remek djelo na temelju slika i trailera al mi je bilo glupo ubacit svoj "nja" usred svih pozitivnih krikova. Vidjet ćemo...

[john_constantine]

nisam niti očekivao drukčije... odličan osvrt, sada sam još više zainteresiran za film, bitno da je kvalitetno i gledljivo...

[A$H]

bas mi zao kaj nisam stigao ga pogledat..

[Boby]

Recenzija moviepreviewcritica:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjmkf4hHmLA

Upozorenje; spoileri!

[GreenHornet]

A gdje ste nasli film za pogledat?

[HorrorHR]

Sa novinarske projekcije filma Wolfman
http://www.horrorhr.com/sa-novinarske-p ... a-wolfman/

[HorrorHR]

Karte za Cinestar!

http://www.horrorhr.com/wolfman-od-cetv ... -ulaznice/

Opet, ako ste forumaš imate duplu šansu dobiti

[filmofil]

vidio jučer u kinu trailer, izgleda dosta dobro

sada primjetio i nagradnu igru za karte dao bog da dobim napokon u životu na nekoj nagradnoj igri, jebo sreću svoju

[HorrorHR]

With Universal Pictures’ The Wolfman redux in day five of its American release (the flick earned $30 million over the weekend and registered as number #3 at the box office) and the horror fanbase divided over the movie’s use of practical FX versus CGI in the realization of its titular creature, we thought we’d bring you a portion of our chat with FX man Rick Baker, who weighed in on the subject.
Speaking with the visual magician a week before the film’s opening, Baker (who’s responsible for the groundbreaking lupine effects in An American Werewolf in London as well as those in the werewolf flicks Cursed and Wolf) said of the production’s decision to use CG over practical in the transformation of the creature, “People always try to pit the rubber guys against the digital guys, and I think it’s just another tool. A computer is one of my favorite things. I’ve been doing my designs in the computer for twenty-two years, but the biggest problem is that (it offers) you too many choices. That was kind of the problem with this film. I had a really hard problem with getting anyone to decide (on the design). In the old days it was, ‘Do you like this drawing or that drawing?’ and then it was, ‘Let’s go make it.’ (With this film) I spent months trying to convince them of what I thought the wolfman should be, and whenever we had what were supposed to be transformation meetings, they’d very quickly mutate into something else that was easier to talk about.”

Baker reiterated that he isn’t opposed to SPFX though by stating, “It is the digital age, isn’t it? If it was totally up to me in how I would have done the transformation, I would have used a lot of CG. I would have been crazy not to. I would have really liked to have mixed it up (though) and used more makeup and do things like compositing those parts with real bodies or compositing real eyes on a fake head, but it just wasn’t meant to be in this film. (Director) Joe (Johnston) came on to this production fairly late and was inundated by questions by a million people including me – a lot of questions about the transformation and stuff. It turned out for him the best choice was CG so that he could make decisions in post (production), and I totally understand that. I thought they did a terrific job with it though.”
As for his thoughts on filmmakers’ expanding usage of CG in realizing cinematic monsters, Baker said, “I enjoy doing digital work. Why not use it? It’s another way to do things - but I would hate to see all movies being shot in green screen or with motion capture. I’ve said it so many times, but there’s a magic that happens when you have a really good actor in a really good makeup. Part of what fascinated me is that the first time I made myself up and looked at my reflection in the mirror, it wasn’t me looking back. It (the makeup) allowed me to do things that I couldn’t do as myself, and I found out how powerful that was and how much that can mean to an actor.”